More On Judge Molloy’s Ruling On Wolf Delisting

There are a host of articles and press releases out today on yesterday’s ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy against a lawsuit contending that the Congressional delisting of wolves in Montana, Idaho and parts of Washington and Oregon this spring was unconstitutional.

The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation has just fired off a news release terming it and a tentative agreement between the Feds and the state of Wyoming “two good steps towards wolf management.”

Wolf advocates think the ruling lays out a groundwork for, yep, further appeals.

The judge himself, bound by precedent, doesn’t exactly agree with what he decided, writing, “The way in which Congress acted in trying to achieve a debatable policy change by attaching a rider to the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011 is a tearing away, an undermining and a disrespect for the fundamental idea of the rule of law.”

Here’s a roundup of info and comments:

Rob Chaney, The Missoulian: Molloy upholds delisting of wolves in Montana, Idaho

Matt Volz, Associated Press (Helena Independent Record): Congress’ action on wolves upheld

Eric Barker, Lewiston Morning Tribune: Judge upholds congressional wolf rule for Idaho

Barring a last-minute appeal, Idaho and Montana wolf hunts will proceed this year.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: